Tag Archives: Canadian Government

Pondering Utility & Efficiency Of Universities and the Nature of the Market Forces of Which it is Subject To.

I must wonder. Are Universities subject to healthy market forces? Are there forces in play which ensure that Universities are opperating with the greatest possible utility to the public?

These are questions likely worth exploring with resourcefullness.

One particular question which burns in my mind is whether or not we should end public funding directly to the universities. I wonder if public funding is contributing to structures which are not providing the utility we might expect from our educational institutions. We might assess whether or not our expectations of our universities meet our needs or desires while we’re at it.

If the dollars were in the hands of the consumers, who according to economic theory will act in their own best self interests, if the revenue stream were solely in the hands of the student, then conceivably natural free market forces would tend toward creation of the most efficient school providing the most utility to those they are serving, the student.

But, Universities are not solely institutions of teaching. They also provide invaluable research which, presumably, lives in the public domain; of course, in practice, this may not have happened quite to the extent we might expect or desire. Likely, given the choice, taxpayers would prefer that they are getting a return on their tax dollars in the form of public knowledge, rather than paying for intellectual property for a private firm.

Universities are also gathering grounds for the academic and scientific and philosophical and creative (amongst other) communities.

Perhaps public dollars are necessary to maintain that utility which universities provide beyond the environment for students to learn; in any case, we need to wonder what we might lose given the loss of social support in the form of public funds. We might assess the utility that results from our public funds.

Is it possible to seperate those functions of the university which result from public & social investment from those which would become more efficient subject to a purer free market? Are these functions necessarily integrated? Are there any aspects of the university which would function in a pure free market or does effective function depend entirely upon the school being more of a publicly provisioned institution?

Electoral Reform in Canada – It’s Happening (Hopefully, To Our Benefit)

Electoral Reform in Canada. It’ll change this country big-time, one way or the other. It’s probably more important to you than the U.S. election & deserves some attention.

Personally, I greatly want to see this electoral reform. I prefer some Proportional Representation, not entirely sure in what format, maybe Dual Member Proportional Representation (there are many possibilities). Hopefully there are some experts working on this case who will put politics aside & make the right decision.

Unfortunately, I don’t see any public service announcements trying to educate you on the matter, informing you of what system might work best, so it looks like it’s up to you to educate yourself in order to hold your representatives to account & responsibility. Personally, I don’t trust the current government to make the best choice that will benefit Canadians rather than themselves, and neither should you.

If your government representative knows that you are informed on the topic, it’s more likely that government will make the choice which will most benefit the public.

If you read further about it, you will discover that there are some possible problems with Proportional Representation which (in my somewhat informed opinion) can mostly be mitigated by careful implementation; none of those problems which would possibly amount to the democratic deficiencies of our current system, First-Past-The-Post (again, in my opinion).

So baseball is over, the U.S. election is a stupid sideshow, and there is some action you can take now which will help the future of your country; learn, discuss the facts with your family & neighbours, contact your MP, about electoral reform.

If you have any questions or thoughts, please share & hopefully either myself or somebody else on here can help or discuss with you. Please put in some effort to keep your political parroting to a minimum & stick to the facts or honest questions.

Some topics on WikiPedia that can be read include: Proportional Representation, Single Transferrable Vote, Ranked Ballot, First Past The Post.

There is some sort of Canada-wide town hall, online, tonight, here: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/…/maryam-monsef-electoral-refo…

A few things further & a question of my own:

I’ve recently read that holding a national referendum on non-constitutional matters is not legal; is this true? The electoral reform in question is not a constitutional matter, as far as I can tell, so a referendum on this is not possible. Besides, how many of us could even list 4 different implementations of Proportional Representation? 25%? The general public is simply not well informed enough to make this decision & in fact voting systems require expertise to understand in-depth (I have simply scratched the surface myself). Basically, I’m trying to say that the need for a referendum is just political fodder put forth by those that stand to lose from a more democratic representation (both Conservative Party and Liberal Party will lose power when a form of Proportional Representation is implemented, by the way).

Besides that, in the most recent federal election, a strong majority of Canadians voted for parties who were advocating a change away from First Past The Post.

Justin Trudeau has, in the past, expressed preference for a Ranked Ballot voting system.

So discuss here if you want but I’m just hoping to engage you enough such that you will read more about it. Gracias.

communism: will you be a victim?

The Government of Canada (Sorry, the “Harper Government”) is providing $1.5 million in funding to a group titled Tribute to Liberty, who have plans to erect a “victims of communism” monument.  I am so saddened and disgusted by this, I’m going to have to take some time to calm down and think rationally about it in order to properly write about it.

To spend over a million dollars to erect such an illogical and hypocritical propagandistic symbol just outside of Parliament and beside a library is making me feel ill.  Just because there were nations in the past who both utilised communism and caused suffering, does not mean that communism caused suffering.  That is illogical.  If I started a country with a communist government, and decided I needed to slaughter the country next to mine, does that necessarily mean that communism is to blame?  No, it means that I’m a maniacal violent criminal of a leader.

Please people, educate yourselves.  It seems the federal government wants you to believe that communism is this terrible force that necessarily hurts people.  Why is this?  It seems foolish.

Communism is an idea, a model; for governance, economics, and other aspects of society.  It can be democratic and free, or anarchistic, or fascist and totalitarian, depending on who is utilising it.  Capitalism can also be fascist and totalitarian, depending on who utilises it. (Warning: link leads to leftist Analysis)

The Nazis and Soviets were also fascist and totalitarian, the two of which are terrifying; they did indeed cause a great amount of suffering to countless people.  Communism, however, is not necessarily to be feared, and works well as a means of production & governance for some aspects of our community or society.  To erect a monument which denounces communism in this way seems reminiscent of American cold war propaganda techniques.

I don’t necessarily agree with all points in this article (excerpt), (full article .pdf) but it is interesting and describes how our Free Software development methods more or less follow a communist model; it touches on current technology, the history of economics focusing on communism, and government.